Category: airlines

For Alaska Airlines, Business is Booming:

A classic Alaska Airlines Boeing 727-200 taken in 1996 - Photo: Aero Icarus

A classic Alaska Airlines Boeing 727-200 taken in 1996 – Photo: Aero Icarus | FlickrCC

The United States’ fifth-largest air carrier – Alaska Airlines – traces its roots deep into American history; in fact, the airline began in its namesake’s state nearly 27 years before Alaska achieved statehood. The formerly localized west coast regional air carrier boasts an impressive route structure, serving 116 destinations with over 1,200 daily departures. After the 2016 acquisition of San Francisco-based Virgin America, Alaska Airlines began a new phase of operations, utilizing its inheritance of 67 Airbus aircraft and dozens of new routes. When mainline service is combined with wholly-owned subsidiary Horizon Air and contracted carrier SkyWest Airlines, Alaska Airlines proudly boats the honor of operating the “Most West Coast” flights each day.

However, Alaska Airlines and its affiliates have carefully expanded their daily operations far beyond the western United States, serving eastern seaboard destinations from Boston to Miami. In 2014, 25% of all Alaska Airlines daily departures traveled across North America; after the Virgin America acquisition a mere four years later, that figure has nearly doubled. Simultaneously, growth to areas outside of the continental U.S. remains relatively stable and, in some cases, diminished. After connecting Bellingham, Washington to various Hawaiian destinations for nearly a decade, Alaska Airlines announced cessation of all Bellingham nonstop flights except service to Seattle-Tacoma. Growth within the airline’s namesake state of Alaska remains stagnant; service to Mexico faces a similar outcome.

Horizon Q400s at Seattle - Photo: David Parker Brown

Horizon Q400s at Seattle

Alaska Airlines, alongside subsidiary Horizon Air and its partner SkyWest Airlines – through a capacity purchase agreement – has strategically eliminated under performing routes over the recent years. Instead, Alaska has elected to beef up its west coast hubs to maintain a stronghold among residents along the west coast. After the 2008 merger of Delta and Northwest, ferocious competition rose in former Alaska Airlines strongholds, specifically Seattle and Portland. Delta Air Lines maintains an expansive international network from Seattle, leading to recent growth and additions in domestic service and direct competition with Alaska Airlines. To combat, recent Alaska Airlines strategic decisions can be categorized into three distinct categories: Streamlined regional operations, acquisition of Virgin America, and an ever-expanding route network.

Alaska Airlines MD-83 - Photo: Andrew W Sieber

Alaska Airlines MD-83 – Photo: Andrew W Sieber | FlickrCC

Streamlined Regional Operations

To fully grasp the recent expansion of the former geographically condensed airline, one can consider Alaska Airlines’ route network from 1987, a time when MD80 and Boeing 727 series aircraft donned the iconic “Chester” tailfin logo. Service spanned the western United States in a vertical north-south manner; Chicago and Washington D.C. marked the airlines’ sole destinations east of the Mississippi river.

Horizon Air, then in its infancy stage, served various Northwest destinations using Fokker F27 and Fairchild Metroliner aircraft. An astonishing number of these former Horizon Air destinations – 11, to be exact – are no longer served by the carrier. The list of terminated destinations includes rural mountain communities such as Idaho Falls, Idaho, agriculture towns like Pendleton, Oregon, and the coastal city of Port Angeles, Washington.

As aircraft technology gave rise to regional jets and efficient turboprop aircraft like the Q400, Horizon Air began to deliberately shift service away from rural communities, instead opting to service more profitable, higher-capacity routes. The purchase of Bombardier CRJ700 series aircraft expanded regional connection possibilities; the regional network of Horizon Air quickly encompassed numerous routes spanning across multiple west coast states. Ultimately, after consolidating the Horizon Air brand into parent Alaska Airlines, the CRJ700-series aircraft slowly left the fleet; briefly, SkyWest operated some former Horizon Air CRJ700s for Alaska Airlines on longer, low-density routes.

That time I wore cowboy boots to Missoula

Q400 to Missoula

With the advent of the Embraer E175-series aircraft, Horizon Air gained the ability to serve destinations far from their west coast hubs of Seattle and Portland. As a result, routes blossomed that were previously deemed too long for Q400 turboprop service, but lacking the demand for frequent mainline Alaska Air connectivity. The 76-seat E175 fills a unique niche market for expansion of the Alaska Air regional network; its jet engines allow for faster cruise speeds at higher altitudes, a greater range, and a more comfortable ride for passengers. Communities such a Bozeman, Reno, and Boise see multiple daily flights from Seattle on E175 aircraft, a service that was dominated by Q400s a few short years ago. However, perhaps more significant for Alaska Airlines, the E175 type allowed for the genesis of new services, stemming from its ability to carry light loads on relatively long flights. This unique ability led to new nonstop destinations added to the Alaska Air network from Seattle, including Milwaukee, Wichita, Oklahoma City and, most recently, El Paso.

BONUS: Giddy Up, Q400: Taking the Cowboy Boots Express to Montana

Despite possessing the same number of seats as the Q400, Alaska Air saw increased profit margins with E175 operations as reported in Alaska Air Group’s quarterly financial statements. In turn, Alaska Air continues to steadily retire the Q400 aircraft; a fleet size of 50 Q400s at the end of 2017 is projected to dwindle to only 23 by the conclusion of 2020. Conversely, Alaska Air continues to increase its operation of E175s; 62 of the type will sport the “Chester” logo by the end of 2020, split evenly between Horizon Air and through the capacity purchase agreement with SkyWest Airlines. Although the E175 is more profitable on some routes, the Q400 holds a unique niche market, servicing Alaska’s shortest routes, comprised largely of intrastate service.

The Horizon Air brand has greatly matured since its Pacific Northwest beginnings, but the Horizon charm and feel remains consistent with its original model. Select complimentary alcoholic beverages are still served on all Horizon-branded flights, and its employees’ passion for service lives on today. Its network spans as far east as Missouri and north as Alberta; yet its Seattle roots continue to dominate the Pacific Northwest skies.

Ironically the Alaska 737 with the More to Love livery celebrating their merger with Virgin was parked next to our A321 at SFO - Photo: Jeremy Dwyer-Lindgren | JDLMultimedia

The special More to Love livery celebrates the merging of Virgin and Alaska – Photo: Jeremy Dwyer-Lindgren | JDLMultimedia

Alaska Acquires Virgin America

Beginning in the early 2000s, Alaska Airlines saw the greatest change to their route network. New destinations – accessible through their predominately Boeing 737 fleet – appeared on timetables; new services included destinations across the continental United States. Cities in the northeast, such as Boston and Newark were added. Northwest-based passengers heading to the warm climates of Orlando and Miami rejoiced as Alaska announced nonstop destinations to cities along the Atlantic Coast. In late 2007, Alaska began crossing the Pacific Ocean, expanding service to Honolulu from Seattle and Anchorage. Within the next few years, Alaska extended service to Hawaii beyond Oahu, adding Kahului on Maui and Kona on the Big Island.

By the early 2010s, Alaska served nearly all major United States leisure and business destinations from their Pacific Northwest hubs. However, the route map prior to the acquisition of Virgin America heavily favored destinations bordering the Pacific Ocean; many transcontinental services were operated on a once-daily schedule stemming from low passenger demand. Simultaneously, post-merger with Northwest, Delta began beefing up service to Seattle, elevating it to hub status in 2014. Continental ceased operations in 2012 after acquisition by United. Southwest merged with Orlando-based value-focused competitor AirTran. As a result, localized airline strongholds gave way to carriers with major hubs across the country; to maintain competitiveness, Alaska Airlines needed to acquire another carrier.

BONUS: Virgin American is Gone, but its Style Lives On

After the $4 billion acquisition of Virgin America, the “Redwood” callsign was officially retired on April 24, 2018; however, its routes initially rolled over into the Alaska Airlines network. The Virgin America acquisition added no new destinations to the Alaska Airlines service area; however, it created multiple transcontinental routes originating from California. Previously, Alaska Airlines operated eastbound flights predominately from their Seattle and Portland hubs. Virgin America operated service to the same destinations – such as Dallas, Fort Lauderdale, and Boston – from their Los Angeles and San Francisco hubs. After the merger, the revamped Alaska Airlines maintained service to the same destinations from hubs placed along the Pacific Coast.

Combined route map - Image: Alaska Airlines

Virgin America and Alaska Airlines combined route network after the merger – Image: Alaska

An Expanded Route Network for Alaska Airlines

The addition of dozens of routes to the Alaska Airlines network appeared to cement Alaska’s stronghold in transcontinental flights – at least temporarily. In subsequent years, many short-lived nonstop connections experienced a reduction in frequency or complete elimination from the timetable. Most notably, two major California markets – San Francisco and San Diego – have experienced the greatest reductions in service. Albuquerque and Kansas City, both destinations added to the Alaska network after the merger with Virgin America, will no longer receive service to San Francisco via Alaska Airlines. Four others – Nashville, Baltimore, Philadelphia, and Raleigh/Durham – have been reduced to seasonal summer-only service. Further south in San Diego, Alaska announced the removal of six nonstop destinations: Albequerque, El Paso, Kansas City, Minneapolis/St.Paul, Omaha, and St. Louis. In other locales, Reno to Boise and Burbank to San Jose in the Bay Area have also been eliminated entirely.

Despite the plethora of route reductions and elimination, Alaska remains in a positive growth trend. As Seattle experiences major congestion within its sole commercial airport, Alaska ventured north to Paine Field in Everett, Washington. Home of the Boeing Everett Factory – the largest building in the world by total volume at over 13 million cubic meters – Everett possessed the capacity and infrastructure to host commercial air service after Propeller Investments constructed a two-gate passenger terminal.  On March 4, 2019, Alaska Airlines launched its first passenger flight from Paine Field; today, the airline operates nonstop service to eight destinations with planned service to two additional cities from the north Seattle suburb.

An E175 operated by Horizon at SEA.

With the recent network changes, airport departure slots become unused and aircraft sit idle. With the intent to optimize available resources, Alaska increased service on transcontinental routes connecting San Francisco to Chicago and Anchorage, while simultaneously offering more daily departures between San Diego to Boston and Orlando. Alaska announced brand-new nonstop service from California to Redmond/Bend, Spokane, Missoula, and Boise. Served on E175 aircraft, Alaska Airlines finds itself in direct competition with regional carrier United Express and budget operator Allegiant Air.

BONUS: Flying the Alaska Airlines Embraer E175

History often repeats itself; if prior successes are any indication, the Chester logo will continue to thrive in the sky for decades to come.

The post For Alaska Airlines, Business is Booming appeared first on AirlineReporter.

October 21, 2019 at 05:05PM Source: https://ift.tt/2Ex2ezu

The Case for Copa Defecting to American:

As LATAM prepares to consciously uncouple from American, the discussion has centered around what American can do to shore up its already-solid Latin American network. In the vision I laid out recently, the least controversial piece was that American should use Gol (an airline that was unconsciously uncoupled from Delta as part of this) to feed its Brazilian network. That’s really a no-brainer. But my second suggestion of snagging Copa away from United was met with more resistance. Some of you asked for it, so here it is: the case for Copa making the switch.

I’ll set some boundaries here. I’m looking at this from a US <–> Latin America perspective. This is about how the partnership of American and Copa would be more beneficial than the current United and Copa agreement; it’s not looking at the airline overall. Let’s start with this from American’s perspective.

Original image “A Treat for the Dogs” by LollypopFarm is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 

American’s Perspective

For American the loss of LATAM hurts only slightly from a network standpoint. American already serves nearly all of the destinations in South America that generate significant traffic. The few it doesn’t serve can either be added by American (likely with MAX or neo aircraft) or through very limited partnerships.

Sure, those who remain loyal to LATAM will be tougher to retain, but American has its own strong loyalty in South America that goes back decades. Fun fact: According to DB1B data, for the year ending March 31, 2019, nearly 60 percent of American’s passengers flying between the US and South America originated in South America.

On the one hand, this is about American filling in the corners where it needs help. Gol is great for that. Gol can aggregate the drips of traffic that want to go from small town Brazil up to the US and funnel those people on to American flights (or vice versa). Every little bit helps, and the volume should help to bolster additional American frequencies to the country.

While Copa can serve that same purpose in northern South America, it can do more than that for American. Think about this from the US perspective. To serve South America, American has its big hub in Miami with a secondary hub in Dallas/Fort Worth. Nearly everything has to funnel through those cities to reach South America.

This may work from bigger cities throughout the country that have frequent flights to Miami, but it doesn’t work as well beyond that.

Take Las Vegas, for example. Looking at a random date in the future, American’s options to go from Las Vegas to Lima are either an afternoon flight via DFW connecting to a redeye or the same thing via Miami with a very long layover. (There’s also a redeye to Miami followed by an 8+ hour layover, if that’s more your bag.) If you add Copa to the mix, then you can do a redeye to Panama City followed by an easy connection to Lima.

Adding a Panama City hub to a Miami and Dallas/Fort Worth operation gives better coverage with more frequencies at more times of day. In a joint venture, they could work to time flights better to not only allow better single connection options but double connects as well.

This assumes that Copa would keep most of its network intact and American and Copa would come together to open new routes. I’d expect an easy case to be made for American’s hubs in Phoenix, Charlotte, and Philadelphia. Opportunities abound to connect places like Austin, St Louis, and Nashville among others.

Would this dilute the Miami hub? Possibly to some extent. But the upside is there to be able to take more traffic with better coverage and frequencies on both sides.

That’s the easy argument. The hard part is convincing Copa.

A Harder Sell for Copa

Leaving United would be a huge turn of events for Copa. The airline was basically Continental Junior for many years. In the late 1990s, Continental owned 51 percent of Copa. Copa used the OnePass program and even painted its airplanes to look almost identical to those of Continental. Between 2005 and 2008, Continental sold everything off. Then United and Continental merged, but the relationship carried over. Copa even used the MileagePlus program as its own until 2015 when it launched its own program, ConnectMiles.

Copa is part of a pending joint venture application that would see the airline join forces with United and Avianca (and possibly Azul if the rumors are true). That is where I’d start the pitch.

United owns a good chunk of flailing Avianca, so it has incentives to try to fix that airline. Avianca is based in Bogota but also has hublets in Central America, remnants of the TACA empire that Avianca mostly destroyed. In other words, Avianca’s hubs surround Copa’s home in Panama City.

In a three-way arrangement, Copa feels like a third wheel by necessity. Or at the very least, it’s the second wheel that has to help prop up the mess of a third wheel. Historical ties between Copa and United (or its predecessor) may be strong, but the same could have been said for LATAM and American. Nothing is off the table, if the deal is right.

American’s strength in Latin America should help turbo-charge the Panama City hub beyond its already turbo-charged state. Copa would be the only partner in Latin America in the joint venture, and it could then deal with Avianca as a competitor instead of a messy organization that could bring Copa down with it. American’s strong loyalty base in Latin America would help Copa to grow from both ends, something that United alone can’t provide.

In the US, there would be some initial moves to shift capacity from United strongholds to American strongholds, but ultimately there would be more new growth opportunities as all the dots get connected.

I realize this is a controversial suggestion, and I’ve had lengthy discussions with others in the industry who disagree with me vehemently. I can see both sides of this debate, but in my mind, Copa is better off making the move. American would be too.

October 21, 2019 at 01:45PM Source: https://crankyflier.com

San Francisco Shuffles Its Gate Numbers:

If you flew through San Francisco (SFO) yesterday, you may have noticed things looked a bit different. No, no. It’s not that the planes can actually run on time when there’s a cloud in the sky. (I mean, please.) The big change is cosmetic. All gates changed their numbers. Nothing like a good gate shuffle to get the blood pumping.

The old system of numbering at SFO was to use straight-up numbers increasing in a counter-clockwise manner. Gate numbers started in Terminal 1 and then topped out with gate 90 in Terminal 3. This has been somewhat problematic for awhile.

When the International Terminal opened in 2000, those gates numbers took on a modified numbering system. They still had numbers that fit into the overall system, but now they added the concourse letter in front. At least, that’s what happened officially.

When I flew JetBlue up to SFO in May of this year, I landed at gate A11B. Not all airlines used the letters however. United flight 837 took off from gate 97, or so United said, on Tuesday. That’s technically gate G97, but United didn’t bother with the letter.

The opening of the the new Terminal 1 had to be the catalyst for the change. The old twin banjo concourse in Terminal 1 (the non-Delta gates) had 22 gates numbered from 20 up through 38 (using A/B as needed). The Delta gates began at 40. But the new concourse has 28 gates. They could have just gone crazier with the A/B designations, or they could re-number everything. They chose the latter.

As of yesterday, every single gate at SFO has officially been re-numbered. Now, the terminals become somewhat irrelevant and instead, it’s the concourses that matter more. As was the case in the International Terminal before, each gate will start with the letter of the concourse. But instead of having the numbers increase around the circle, each concourse will now start with gate 1. Here’s the map with before-and-after numbering.

A1-15 (International Terminal) – Alaska (Intl), Frontier, Hawaiian, Sun Country, and several International carriers
The old A gates are the closest to their original numbering, but this re-numbering allowed SFO to get rid of the A/B designators so it’s sequential throughout that concourse. As an aside, I would imagine that the remainder of the domestic airlines will move into B once that work is done.

B1-27 (Terminal 1) – JetBlue and Southwest
The new concourse in Terminal 1 never had old gate numbers, since, well, it’s new. But these B gates replace the old gates 20-38. Note that all those in red have yet to open.

C1-10 (Terminal 1) – Delta
Delta’s gates are due to eventually be re-done, but for now, they just get a number change. Eventually there will be one new gate added to C (technically between B and C) once the construction is done.

D1-18 (Terminal 2) – Alaska and American
This is the old international terminal that was re-done as Virgin America’s home. It will eventually become all Alaska’s, I believe, and American will move into Terminal 1.

E1-13 (Terminal 3) – United
These are the old gates in the 60s that American used to use before moving into Terminal 2. After American moved out, United moved in and fixed the place up. This will also include 70/71A/71B.

F1-22 (Terminal 3) – United
The meat of United’s operation is concentrated here in what used to be gates 72-90.

G1-14 (Terminal 3) – United (Intl), its partners, and some international cats and dogs
United continues to use the G gates, but the gates now have lower numbers than they did in the old days. For example, G92 is now G1.

This seems like a lot of effort, but will there be enough benefit? I’d think it probably is worthwhile. After all, the use of A/B designators got somewhat out-of-control as they tried to shoehorn the number of gates they had into a fixed set of numbers. I count more than 30 in the old system, including a couple of C gates. Those are ALMOST all gone. Inexplicably, gate 73A becomes F3A, the only one to use that in the entire airport.

This change also eliminates some of the quirks of the old numbering system. For example, 72 and 81 were about as close to each other as 72 and 71B or 76A and 81. A change in the first number made people think it was a different terminal (as is the case in Los Angeles) even though it wasn’t. So this should reduce confusion.

This is similar to what Honolulu did last year, and in an environment where the number and location of gates can change, it does make sense. There is more flexibility when you start with the concourse, because then you can have up to 99 gates without needing to re-number. And there is no chance any concourse is going to have 99 gates.

I’m sure it’s been disorienting for travelers who didn’t realize the change was coming, but as with everything else, people will eventually get used to the new system.

October 17, 2019 at 01:45PM Source: https://crankyflier.com

Join the Drone Advisory Committee (DAC) on October 17:

The FAAwill hold a Drone Advisory Committee (DAC) meeting on October 17, 2019 in Washington, D.C. The DAC will continue our public conversation about how we can collaborate on important issues like remote i.d., technical challenges, security, recreational operations, and waivers. Its a broad-based, long-term federal advisory committee that provides the FAA with advice on key drone integration issues by helping us identify challenges and prioritize improvements.

If you cant join us in person, well stream it live on the FAAs social media platforms: Twitter @FAANews, Facebook @FAA and YouTube beginning at 9:00 am ET.

October 15, 2019 at 10:57PM Source:FAA.gov News and Updates https://ift.tt/2aTM6Ji

Delta to Portland: Big Bins and Great Service (Trip Report):

Just a couple months after my last trip to Portland, it was time to return. And just like last time, I had a bunch of flight issues before travel.

We were actually heading up for a family wedding in the Willamette Valley an hour outside Portland, and after we booked… the wedding date changed. So we lost those bookings (though got lucky when an Alaska schedule change let us get at least one way refunded), and we rebooked for the week earlier on Southwest up with Delta taking us back… until Southwest canceled our flight up due to MAX issues. Once that was refunded, we bought a ticket on Delta going up and we were finally set.

For people who fly Delta regularly, this won’t be anything overly exciting. For those who don’t, take notice It was just another nearly-flawless Delta performance

We left home early to get up to LAX during rush hour, park at Quikpark, and then shuttle into the terminals. On the bus, our gate changed from the miserable Terminal 3 over to the much nicer Terminal 2. That was good news since we had time to kill. My daughter insisted on wearing a “happy birthday” headband even though her birthday was a couple months ago. That means we had all kinds of people wishing her happy birthday. The line minder at security even sang to her. We were through in no time.

We found our gate in the back corner of the concourse and grabbed a seat. There was enough seating, but man, was it busy in there. That place is a madhouse. Once we grabbed our seats, a gate agent named Kevin came up to me and said, “Are you the Cranky Flier?” I cautiously said yes, but I was concerned that Delta was flagging me and that’s how he knew. That wasn’t the case. He said he’d been reading the blog for years and just recognized me. I quickly warmed up, and we talked until it was time to board.

We were in Main3 for our boarding group, and I was surprised to see no crowding in the gate area at all. It was just a nice orderly process. By the time they called Main3, the last group before Basic, I was afraid there wouldn’t be room for bags. Oh, was I wrong.


September 13, 2019
Delta 473 Lv Los Angeles (LAX) 916a Arr Portland (PDX) 1134a
Los Angeles (LAX): Gate 26A, Runway 24L, Depart 3m Early
Portland (PDX): Gate D3, Runway 10R, Arrive 5m Late
N315NB, Airbus A319-114, Standard Delta colors, ~95% Full
Seat 19B, Coach
Flight Time 2h6m

The retrofitted A319 is a glorious bird. The bins are just so big, and there was no problem finding space for everyone’s bags.

The cabin looks modern. We sat down in our seats to find a big monitor staring back at us. My tray table was dirty on the front but otherwise the plane looked immaculate.

Adding to the star power of the airplane itself was… a celebrity. Oscar Nuñez (Oscar from The Office) was sitting in First Class.

Once in the air, I was surprised to hear the flight attendants say that service wouldn’t begin until we had reached our cruising altitude. It took a little while to get there, but the carts came out promptly once we leveled out. I had started flipping through TV options and saw they had Shrill from Hulu, something I had heard about but hadn’t seen since I don’t have a Hulu subscription. I watched three episodes and that made the time pass quickly.

Seeing the flight attendants coming, I opened my tray table to find a wet, sticky, and disgusting mess.

What kind of person leaves a table like this?! I asked the flight attendant for a napkin, and she gave me one. But when she turned, her eyes got big and she asked if it was like that when I got on. She looked horrified, and wet some napkins to help clean it up.

With that fixed, we were given our choice of nuts, Cheez-Its, Biscoff, and Kind bars. My son and I both chose Biscoff… one for him and one for his cousin who was flying Southwest up to meet us and wouldn’t be so lucky otherwise.

I could log on for an hour of free wifi thanks to T-Mobile, so I did that while I was watching TV. It’s times like these that remind me how much I do appreciate having those separate screens.

We flew up the coast and then turned inland around Monterey. That means we were strategically positioned for an expansive view of the San Francisco Bay Area on a clear day.

It wasn’t long before we were descending into Portland. There were some low, scattered clouds that made for a scenic approach. We had to go way west and hold our altitude under 3,000 feet for several minutes, dodging and cutting through the clouds before we turned back to land.

The wedding was a success and the weather stayed clear for it. I do have to say a couple things about this place. First, the Evergreen Aviation Museum. What a great spot. Go. And bring a bathing suit because of the water park that has a 747 on top of it where all the slides start. (I didn’t go in because I didn’t have a swimsuit. Next time…)

Second, I have to give a shout-out to the Atticus Hotel. It’s not often that I have an experience at a hotel that sticks with me, but this place… words just can’t describe it. They made us feel like family from the moment we arrived. We asked the front desk agent when we arrived that first night where we should go for dinner. She said she had a great idea but wanted to make sure they could fit our group of 10. When they didn’t answer the phone, she said it was just a block away so she RAN OVER THERE. It was just so good the entire time. They remembered what we were doing and asked us how the wedding was when we returned. And the rooms… the rooms were beautiful. We had a Luxury Balcony Suite. It wasn’t cheap, but it was worth the price. That’s not something I say often.

When we woke up on Sunday for the return, it had turned gloomy, and not just because we were leaving this glorious hotel. A storm front had moved in, and the rain was pouring down. It was also much chillier. We hopped in the car and drove the hour back to the airport. After dropping off the rental, we walked back into the terminal through the underground tunnel. Security was a breeze, and we were back at the same gate at which we had arrived two days earlier.

The flight before ours was boarding, so newly-vacated seats were easy to find. We sat and waited it out until boarding began. Boarding was a repeat of the way up. People weren’t crowding at all, and it was all nice and orderly.


September 15, 2019
Delta 473 Lv Portland (PDX) 1215p Arr Los Angeles (LAX) 231p
Portland (PDX): Gate D3, Runway 10R, Depart 2m Early
Los Angeles (LAX): Gate 37A, Runway 24L, Arrive 12m Late
N371NB, Airbus A319-114, Standard Delta colors, ~99% Full
Seat 18B, Coach
Flight Time 2h00m

We had pretty much the same experience going back with huge bins and friendly flight attendants… and celebrities. This time, Camryn Manheim was in First Class. I suppose that shouldn’t be a surprise since she’s in the new series Stumptown which is filmed in Portland. My wife said there was another guy she recognized but couldn’t place him. Apparently Delta is the airline of the stars, at least on this route.

Taxi-out was long probably because only one runway is open right now. This was good for me, because we I wanted to watch the movie Long Shot. It is 2h6m and the flight was 1h56m. The race was on.

We took off into the murk and climbed through it for awhile until peeking our heads above it at cruise. The flight attendants came through as usual, and I became a power user. I had my daughter’s TV tuned to the Rams game since she was glued to her tablet. My TV was on Long Shot. Then I broke my computer out to write this up.

Every few minutes, the flight attendants came through with water. They were a constant and welcome presence. At one point, I had to take my son to the lav. If the airplane has one flaw, it’s those rear space-saver lavs. They are so damn tiny.

We did the usual approach from the north, swung around downtown LA and landed on the north runways. This time we parked in Terminal 3. What a mess that place is. I took this photo of the hordes waiting to board after we arrived.

Sure, it looks much better than it did in the Virgin America days. There is a new coat of paint, new eateries, and a more professional look. But it’s a construction zone as they work to finally replace this thing. For now, the neck of the terminal is completely cut-off. Travelers have to go through security on the lower level and walk through the old baggage claim tunnel to get to the gates. This is a return to its roots as a true satellite building.

We navigated our way out, sat in traffic while the Quikpark shuttle crept around the horseshoe, and finally headed home. I couldn’t help but think about how much more pleasant it was to fly Delta than many other airlines I’ve flown recently. And did I mention the bins?

October 15, 2019 at 01:45PM Source: https://crankyflier.com

Help me! I am Crowdsourcing My Honeymoon.:

Santorini, Greece - Photo: Pedro Szekely | FlickrCC

Santorini, Greece – Photo: Pedro Szekely | FlickrCC

I am going to be a bit selfish here, but I think for good reason!

I recently got married (yay) and we wanted to wait a bit to plan our honeymoon; we didn’t want to be planning a wedding AND a trip at the same time. My new bride and I both want to go some place we’ve never been before. While we think we are set on a destination, there are so many fun options to get there and different things to do; I thought I would try to see if any of you had some swell ideas.

I’ve never done something like this before, so I’m not sure if it will work. But it can’t hurt! My idea is to give you all some of my thoughts so far, and see what you think. Maybe I will get 0 comments and be sad, or maybe I will be overwhelmed and no better off, but I am hoping to get a gem or two out of this little experiment! Here we go:

The Big Picture

  • We plan to spend the majority of our time in Santorini, Greece. It’s place she has wanted to visit and neither of us have been.
  • We are not fans of places with a million tourists.
  • Being native Washingtonians, we don’t like hot weather.
  • Shooting for late April to mid May, but would do late September to early October if needed. 
  • Wanting to do about 10 days total, but would expand up to 14, if it made sense.
  • Being this is our honeymoon, we are cool spending a bit more on where we stay, the food, etc, if it has a good ROIOF (return of investment on fun — acronyms are fun!). Obviously we have a reasonable budget, but I don’t want it to hold back any ideas.

There is the Santorini Airport – Photo: Andres Alvarado | FlickrCC

Getting to/from Santorini

  • We will be departing out of Seattle. Unless it is a big enough difference, we don’t really want to go to YVR or PDX. (Editor’s note: what about PAE?)
  • Getting there, I am looking at getting creative. Maybe do something like flying into London, Paris, or Rome and take trains/ferries down to Athens for the final ferry to Santorini? Maybe stop for a night once or twice on the way down? Been reading up on options, but wonder if it would be more of a pain than it is worth. 
  • Coming back, I think we would just want to fly as quick and cheap as possible, but not more than 18 hours for a total trip. Looks like some airlines like Condor and Norwegian have options, but not every day, so need to play with dates. 
  • Even after 10 years of writing this site, I am still a miles noob. As I write this I have 35,000 Alaska miles. After a basic search, that can get me a one-way ticket to LHR or FRA. Not a requirement to use, but that would save a few $. 
  • Since we have our miles with Alaska, it would be nice to earn miles with them on tickets that we pay for. 
  • My awesome wife is game for me doing a story or two out of our adventures, so if there is a unique airline/aircraft type or if I can pitch an airline for a story/experience, that is a bonus. That said, she wouldn’t be game taking 36hrs, flying the wrong way across the globe to try a bunch of different airlines.
Santorini... the beauty, the height, the water - Photo: Wolfgang Manousek | FlickrCC

Santorini… the beauty, the height, the water – Photo: Wolfgang Manousek | FlickrCC

While we are in Santorini

  • I end up spending more time figuring out how to get to/from a place, the flights, the boats, the trains, etc., and sometimes I forget about planning what to do once I arrive. Guessing maybe some of you can relate? I normally like to have some ideas of things to do, but not all the days scheduled.
  • Once there, I’m looking at probably renting a car. Looks like there are taxis and buses, but not the best, plus we always have fun adventures with driving around on our trips.
  • Looking at things like boat or jetski tour, the hot springs, taking the car to explore the island, relaxing.
  • Want to stay on the Caldera side. Guessing a few nights in one of the nice hotels with amazing views, and a few in a more reasonably priced hotel. Just depends.

Okay, so this ended up being longer than I expected, but there are a lot of moving pieces. Please leave your suggestions/questions in the comments and let’s see what happens. Thank you!

The post Help me! I am Crowdsourcing My Honeymoon. appeared first on AirlineReporter.

October 14, 2019 at 03:05PM Source: https://ift.tt/2Ex2ezu

United Takes the Lead on Simplifying Elite Qualifying By Focusing on Spend:

One of the knocks on United’s loyalty strategies over the years has been that the airline just takes what Delta does and slaps its own name on the change. When it comes to qualifying for elite status, however, United has decided to be the first mover. The airline announced on Friday that it is simplifying elite qualifying metrics and better matching them up with what people pay starting with travel in 2020 for 2021 status. Though it is simplifying the process, that doesn’t mean it’s easy to learn. There are now two new metrics replacing the three old ones, and as always, there are asterisks that make understanding them difficult.

Before we can talk about what United is going to do, I need to back up and explain how it works today along with the problems behind that method.

2019: PQMs, PQSs, and PQDs

Up until the last few years, United let people qualify based on either the number of miles they flew (called Premier Qualifying Miles, or PQMs, in the current language) or the number of flights they took (called Premier Qualifying Segments, or PQSs, in the current language). This opened up the ability for people to do mileage runs. Short by 10,000 points? Just study fare rules and find a cheap ticket at the end of the year. This became a cottage industry that spawned all sorts of websites and strategies to help re-qualify.

The airlines tried to solve the problem of people not spending much to get status by giving bonuses to those who bought expensive tickets. But even that wasn’t enough for United when it followed Delta by introducing the Premier Qualifying Dollar, or PQD. This added a minimum spend requirement to being able to qualify for elite status. Those last minute mileage runs became much tougher to do unless you had already spent a ton of money and just needed more miles.

In other words, United kept piling on requirements on top of requirements to try to jury-rig a system that would reward those it wanted to reward. This led to mass confusion with multiple ways to qualify.

For 2019 travel and spend qualifying for 2020 status, this is how United has things set up:

You either need to earn a certain number of qualifying miles or you need to fly a certain number of flights (both adjusted for high or low fares) in addition to meeting the minimum spend. But what counts as a PQM, a PQS, or a PQD? I won’t bother getting into it, because this system dies at the end of this year.

2020: Hello PQFs, and PQPs

Starting for 2020 travel qualifying for 2021 status, United is introducing only two metrics for qualifying, the Premier Qualifying Flight (PQF) and the Premier Qualifying Point (PQP).

The PQF will replace PQS. What’s the difference? There is no longer any bonus for buying an expensive ticket. One takeoff and landing = one PQF*. That’s easy, oh, except for that asterisk. *Basic Economy earns nothing.

The PQP is a little more complex. This replaces the PQD, and you continue to earn one PQD for each dollar you spend on airfare (excluding tax) on United-issued tickets and paid seating options. But now, you also earn PQPs for the following:

  • paid upgrades (online, at the gate, etc)
  • co-pays on upgrade awards
  • Star Alliance operated flights on non-United (016) issued tickets

It’s that last one that’s likely to make the biggest difference going forward for most people. Today, if you buy a ticket on a Star Alliance partner, you get no PQDs. PQPs will take those into account, and that can add up quickly.

This is where complexity creeps back into the system. United still doesn’t know how much money you spent on those non-United tickets, so it will take the number of regular redeemable award miles you earn and divide by 5 for flights operated by so-called “preferred partners” which are Air Canada, Air China, Air New Zealand, ANA, Avianca, Azul, Copa, and Lufthansa Group* airlines. For all other Star partners, you’ll divide by 6. Details are here.

There’s that nasty asterisk again. For Lufthansa Group, it’s really Lufthansa, Swiss, Brussels, Austrian, and… Eurowings. For some reason, Edelweiss and Air Dolomiti are left out. And why is Air China a preferred partner? Maybe United had to suck up to the Chinese for labeling Taipei as being part of Taiwan at some point. But I digress.

The end result is that you can now earn status in two ways. Here’s the chart:

As you can see, the biggest change is that PQMs disappear entirely. It now doesn’t matter at all how far you fly. Effectively, United is saying there are two ways to earn status. You either fly a lot or you spend a lot.

  • Fly a Lot: If you fly a certain number of flights and spend an average of $334 on each flight, then you will qualify. If you fly more than the required number of flights, then the amount you’d have to spend on average drops, because… math.
  • Spend a Lot: If you buy expensive tickets, you can qualify just by taking 4 United flights the entire year. You just have to hit those dollar amounts in the chart above to qualify.

This is actually a good way to handle this, because it deals with the issue of value. If you fly the airline a lot, even if it’s on shorter flights in coach, you can still qualify as long as you have at least some moderately-priced tickets (or a couple of really expensive ones in addition to cheapies). On the other hand, if you don’t fly a lot, but you buy very expensive tickets, United will still reward you with status. Miles really don’t matter in a world where you have spend and number of flights.

While the increased simplicity is nice, whether you like it or not depends upon what this does to your individual ability to earn status and nothing else. When I spoke with Luc Bondar, VP of Loyalty for United, he said “in broad terms, this will grow the total Premier population.” But he then said it will “rebalance” things. I take that to mean that there will be more elite members, but it will skew more toward the lower tiers.

Of course, this doesn’t apply until 2020 travel for 2021 qualification, so it’s not in effect yet. Travelers will probably be crunching numbers to figure out how they need to change their behavior. At least the new calculations should be simpler than they are today.

October 14, 2019 at 01:45PM Source: https://crankyflier.com

Cranky on the Web: Icelandair Leaves Kansas City:

After Icelandair leaves Kansas City, can KCI land another nonstop flight to Europe?Kansas City Star
The local paper took a deep look at Icelandair leaving Kansas City and interviewed me along with a ton of others. My entire thoughts aren’t in the article, but effectively, Icelandair must have seen Kansas City as one of the weakest performers in the network. That shouldn’t necessarily mean the airport can’t support a European flight, but it’s also not a good sign.

October 12, 2019 at 01:45PM Source: https://crankyflier.com

ADS-B Rebates Going, Going, Gone……:

WASHINGTON The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announced today that all 20,000 rebates offered to general aviation aircraft owners to equip their aircraft with a new surveillance technology have been issued and are no longer available.

Aircraft owners who have already reserved their rebate, but not claimed it yet with installation, will be allotted the specified time needed to complete the requirements for the rebate.

Starting Jan. 1, 2020, Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast (ADS-B) Out avionics will be required for aircraft flying in certain, controlled airspace. ADS-B is the state-of-the-art surveillance system that enables air traffic controllers to track aircraft with greater accuracy and reliability.

The FAA first launched the $500 ADS-B rebate program in September 2016 to encourage owners of fixed-wing, single engine piston aircraft to equip in advance of the Jan. 1, 2020 deadline and take advantage of the many benefits ADS-B offers. The FAA has reiterated that the deadline will not change.

For more information on ADS-B, visit our website.

October 12, 2019 at 12:04AM Source:FAA.gov News and Updates https://ift.tt/2aTM6Ji

3 Links I Love: Filling the Void, Boeing in a Pickle, Slots:

This week’s featured link:

Lufthansa to start flying to Ljubljana after Adria Airways’ collapseReuters
Question: Oh no, what will happen if our national airline fails?! Answer: A better airline will move in and serve the markets that have demand.

Image of the Week: Happy 100th birthday, KLM. The airline put together a little video to tug on those heart strings, and it works quite nicely. How am I celebrating? Well, I’ve booked my first flight on KLM.

Two for the road:

Boeing’s 737 in another pickle, Part 2Leeham News and Analysis
Boeing just can’t catch a break. Now a critical part on existing 737s is cracking even though it never should have been. A fix is on the way and some airplanes have been grounded. Here’s a detailed post about what’s going on.

Heathrow slots: the insiders guideRuby
Have you ever wanted to know more about slots at Heathrow? Well, too bad. Now you’re going to learn anyway. This is Virgin Atlantic’s blog, and they trot out their expert to give details on how it all works.

October 11, 2019 at 04:33PM Source: https://crankyflier.com